Cost comparison between triangular aluminum lattice shell and meridian lattice shell

2010-07-10View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by laisheng on 2011-5-29 08:16 In the Zhoushan Liquid Chemical Terminal Transfer Base Project of the Installation Branch of the Third Company of China Construction Third Engineering Bureau, the original design of the storage tank roof with a capacity of 20,000 cubic meters was a "double meridian reticulated shell". After changing it into a "spatial triangular grid aluminum reticulated shell", this alone saved 1.57 million yuan in costs. See related reports http://zjsjb.ceepa.cn/show_more.php?doc_id=32784 http://zjsjb.ceepa.cn/show_more.php?doc_id=54961

Reply #22010-07-11

Meridian shells have been proven to be unsafe structures.

Reply #32010-07-11

Does csme have any evidence or information that can be displayed online?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Cost comparison between triangular aluminum lattice shell and meridian lattice shell

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links