What is the difference between major hazard source assessment and current safety status assessment?
Thread Content
As the title suggests, just after completing the safety status assessment, another assessment of major hazard sources has come up. Is local safety management nowadays aimed at extracting money from businesses through these means?
Currently, the focus of assessment for major hazard sources differs from that of safety status assessments. For the assessment of major hazard sources, it’s not always carried out by qualified agencies; the costs are low and the process is relatively simple. In contrast, a safety status assessment is a comprehensive evaluation of the entire factory
A safety status assessment is an evaluation of your company’s overall safety conditions, while an assessment of major hazard sources is a specific type of evaluation; they are not the same thing. However, it’s certain that safety assessments require payment
As far as I know, some safety assessment companies have good relationships with certain **departments.
The assessment of the current situation and the evaluation of major hazard sources can actually be carried out together – why not dedicate a separate chapter in the assessment of the current situation to discussing major hazard sources?
I wonder whether, when conducting assessments of the safety status in the poster’s workplace to identify major hazard sources, the 2009 version of \"Identification of Major Hazard Sources\" is used as a basis? If so, as long as the safety status assessment report is still valid, it can be used as a substitute for the major hazard source assessment report in the submission materials.
This post was last edited by Hou Xiaodi on 2010-7-15 at 10:26. Evaluating the current safety situation is akin to having a comprehensive health check-up; evaluating major hazard sources is like discovering a tooth decay during such a check-up, which prompts you to see a dentist. You surely can’t say at that moment, “I just had a medical check-up; do I still need to see a dentist?”
At present, in many places two reports are still required, and it seems that the major hazard assessment is assigned to a specific company to carry out. A status assessment report cannot replace an assessment of major hazard sources
The third floor is correct; a current condition assessment cannot replace a specialized assessment of major hazard sources
The third floor is correct; a current condition assessment cannot replace a specialized assessment of major hazard sources
What the friend on the 6th floor said isn’t quite correct; in the assessment of the current situation, it is only necessary to identify major hazard sources, rather than conducting an evaluation of those sources. There is a huge difference between the two. The assessment of the current situation can only be carried out by evaluation agencies, while the assessment of major hazard sources can also be done by firms of registered safety engineers; in some areas, companies can carry out this assessment on their own (provided it is approved by the safety supervision agency).