Investigation on the continuous operation cycle of gasification units
Thread Content
Due to the different gasification processes used by various companies, their operation cycles also vary. Some enterprises are quite secretive and refuse to disclose the operation cycles of their gasification units, which hinders communication and prevents these companies from improving their own operation cycles. Therefore, I propose that companies make public their operation cycles. Format: Province where the manufacturer is located, gasification process used, pressure level, operating temperature in °C, whether a solvent is used, continuous operation time, reasons for shutdowns, and methods to address these issues. Those who respond will receive significant bonus points. Let me start with my example: Heilongjiang Province, Texaco water-coal slurry pressurized gasification, 4.0 Mpa, 1350 °C, solvent is used; continuous operation time: 66 days; reason for shutdown: burner leakage; no particularly effective solution available
Shanxi Province: Grey polymerization, 0.08 MPa; 1050 hours of continuous operation – the system was shut down after 31 days
This post was last edited by GSP on 2010-7-28 09:56. DeShuGu in Anhui Province: 4.0 Mpa, 1310℃; operation without limestone for 87 days – burner leakage
Inner Mongolia Texaco: 4.0 MPA, 1310°C; no limestone used; operated continuously for 78 days – slag outlet clogged
Not many people are participating, so I hope everyone can give their support!
The HT-L space coal pressurized gasification furnace operated continuously for 91 days, with the burner running in total for 125 days.
Last edited by huaguiyi on 2010-7-28 18:12. Let’s participate to increase popularity... Jiangsu Province: Texaco, 8.7 Mpa, 1280℃, no limestone used; operated continuously for 72 days; plan to switch reactors
Guangxi Liuzhou Shell gasifier: 3.8 Mpa, 1600℃; limestone was used; the filter element broke after 112 days. Hubei Shell: 3.8 Mpa, 1600℃; operation lasted 82 days; the quenching end was damaged