Regarding the pros and cons of canceling moderator rating management and recording the number of management times!
Thread Content
Personally, I think there are still some disadvantages. At least it can be seen now that some moderators have lowered the rating management of the forum, which is not conducive to the development of those Haichu friends who have just come to Haichuan. On the one hand, they are more eager to upgrade. Second, some data are set with higher permissions and it is difficult for them to see. Third, it reduces the workload of the moderators. , is not conducive to the rapid development of the forum, at least this is the phenomenon now. Fourthly, if we only do technical exchanges, at least I personally think that we have not reached such a level, including some of our moderators who are not very professional, because the scope of our forum management is relatively wide, and it is difficult to take into account everything, so it is recommended to see if there are other ways to evaluate moderators.
Agree with the point above, give it a thumbs up.
Think of grading as an obligation. Now my rating feels like I am giving away charity money, trying to use up my daily quota. It's a pity that I'm not very popular. hehe! If the moderator assessment is strict, different reward amounts can be given to different forum areas. Ranked by forum. …… But there is no need to think about it. After all, moderators also work voluntarily. Work is entirely a matter of personal consciousness. There is no right to ask moderators to do too much. I think the main thing is to mobilize everyone's enthusiasm, whether it is moderators, technical experts or friends. Without enthusiasm, there will be no technical exchange. Blindly emphasizing assessment, personally feels that it is of little significance. Haichuan Forum has been around for so long, so it should still have experience in this area. It should be developing in a better and better direction. Hope so.
According to recent observations, there are not many ratings from outsiders on this forum. It is still necessary to rely on the ratings of the moderators of this forum to show recognition and concern for the participants!
First of all, we should mobilize the enthusiasm of each moderator first, in order to better mobilize the enthusiasm of members. For moderators, there should be clear rewards and punishments. If you do well, you should be rewarded. If you are not online all day long and do not manage, you will only come out to have fun at the end of the month when you receive your salary and bonus. It feels like you are eating royal food, so you don’t want to be a moderator like this.
It would be best to make an announcement. If each member can give others equal points every day, accounting for a certain proportion of his own points, can we set up the system to automatically return a certain number of points to him? This can also mobilize the enthusiasm of the majority of members for equal sharing, and can also reduce the workload of moderators. Please consider it as an administrator.
I agree with the original poster. The current management of Haichuan is really terrible. There are very few people who manage the company diligently, but there are more people who cause trouble.
A difficult thing to weigh indeed! If ratings are included in the number of times of management, rating flooding may occur. But it is not included, and * * It reduces the enthusiasm of some moderators to score, but to increase popularity often requires moderators to give more points to members, especially new members. This is a very important means to mobilize members' enthusiasm for participation! Personally, I think it is better to make moderator ratings a part of the management assessment, but as for how to assess and how to prevent the proliferation of ratings, we still need to think carefully. In addition, too few ordinary members participate in rating. Generally, only posts on your own topic will be rated. If people rate more, the level of participation will naturally be deeper, and the people who are rated will be more motivated to communicate. It is a virtuous circle. In fact, rating is a virtue, but for members, it cannot be said to be an obligation. It only depends on self-consciousness. I think they should be given appropriate rewards, encourage them to rate others more, mobilize members' enthusiasm for rating, and let them change their minds and feel that they are the owners of this forum. I don’t know if this is correct or not, but here’s your thoughts!