For a double-pass heat exchanger, how should the number of heat exchange tubes in each pass be distributed?/

2010-08-26View Original

Thread Content

It seems like it should be distributed evenly, but is that really the case? In some software, the arrangement is such that one side has more elements while the other has fewer; 38 elements, 17/21

Reply #22010-08-26

It should be that there is a phase change in the tube medium.

Reply #32010-08-26

The average distribution is seen quite frequently

Reply #42010-08-26

A uniform distribution would be better, as it would result in better stress distribution; but for some other reasons, it probably won’t be uniform either. There’s no strict rule for this, right? Personal opinion

Reply #52010-08-27

Let this post sink,,,, I miscalculated the number. . . :L

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

For a double-pass heat exchanger, how should the number of heat exchange tubes in each pass be distributed?/

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links