HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

ASPEN heat exchanger issues

2010-09-13View Original

Thread Content

I have the following questions: 1. In ASPEN, for example: when two 120 m2 heat exchangers are connected in series/parallel, how should the values of the heat exchange area be entered during simulation? I have some questions. 2. In tower simulation, regarding plate efficiency, is there a difference between using the theoretically calculated number of plates and using the actual number of plates based on plate efficiency? 3. Is there a unified standard for the selection of thermodynamic methods in petrochemical plants? I hope everyone will not hesitate to offer their advice!
Reply #22010-09-13
1. I think it’s more reliable to enter the values separately when connecting them in series. 2. There can be a slight difference sometimes; for example, if the calculated cost is 7.5 units, the actual cost is usually around 8 units. 3. There is no unified standard

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.