It’s so annoying to have to memorize accident cases and take notes every time I go to work; anything that isn’t up to standard is subject to evaluation
Thread Content
This post was last edited by shiyue528 on 2010-9-22 08:24. I really hate having to memorize accident cases and take notes every time I go to work; anything that doesn’t meet the standards is subject to evaluation
“Some forms must be followed” in order to protect others as well as oneself. . .
Once something goes wrong, the cost is too high. Strict requirements, responsible behavior!
But I think it’s pointless to do this; no matter how well one memorizes the cases, what’s the use if there’s no sense of safety? No matter how well the notes are prepared, if one lacks emergency response skills, accidents will still happen. I think it’s better to use that time to conduct more safety drills; anything else is pointless. What’s the use of going through all those formalities?
The purpose of memorizing accident cases is not to memorize them by heart, but to understand the principles, common sense, and lessons behind them, so as to prevent such accidents from occurring in future work.
But in terms of corporate safety management, isn’t there a better way to encourage employees to improve and enhance their safety awareness and skills? It should be noted that such a management approach often leads to dissatisfaction among many employees; frequently, people’s mood and enthusiasm for working are affected by this, and isn’t that also a safety hazard? Many mistakes at work occur because of employees’ poor moods. Although there are many factors that can cause bad moods, I think at the managerial level we should strive to avoid them – allowing employees to go to work happily and return home safely. I believe this slogan carries deep meaning
This post was last edited by eboy3065 on 2010-9-28 09:34. There are too many available options, it’s difficult to satisfy everyone, and production management is not as simple as matters in a kitchen. There is always some pressure and belief involved; in this case, form takes precedence over content.
Reply to 6# Yin Guoqi: As a manager of production, I prefer that you simply memorize the principles behind accidents and draw lessons from them, rather than learning from the actual accidents themselves. The lessons from all accidents come at a price paid in blood!
This post was last edited by beifang0533 on 2010-9-28 at 17:02. Some companies just like to engage in showy projects and projects aimed at creating a good image; they create all sorts of fancy things that look great, but they always fail when it counts. However, we should also understand the equipment management systems and regulations, because the systems are fixed while people are dynamic; we need to apply them flexibly and skillfully. Otherwise, if an accident occurs, there will be no way to undo it. Systems are necessary, but flexible application is even more important.
After reading the responses from friends in Shanghai, I have come to a small conclusion; of course, this is just my personal view. The safety management systems used in production activities are, to some extent, at odds with the actual way in which management is carried out, which leads to conflicts between safety management and the day-to-day operations in production. So how can this contradiction be overcome? I think it requires taking into account the actual circumstances and combining rules and regulations with practical considerations in order to create a more user-friendly management approach