Thread Content
All of our compound fertilizer manufacturers follow what others do: for example, in the case of urea-based compound fertilizers, if the color of the granules produced by the first manufacturer is white, then other manufacturers will also use white granules; Perhaps the first company that uses white dolomite powder can obtain it at a low cost locally, but other companies do not source it from nearby areas; instead, they have to transport it from farther away at a cost of 300 yuan per ton. There are many magnesium manufacturing enterprises in our region, and the dolomite with a diameter of less than 5 millimeters used in magnesium production is considered waste material. When processed into powder, it can be used in compound fertilizers, reducing costs by around 100 yuan per ton. Of course, its color is not pure white ; The color of nitro compounds was gray in Norway’s first plants; nowadays, people prefer to go the longer way rather than use local materials to reduce costs. Instead, they import bituminous coal or shale oil rocks, which increases production costs. Color is an external aspect; what’s important internally is whether the nutrients and their combination are scientifically sound and appropriate.
The issue discussed by the IMLXB moderator is the selection of fillers for compound fertilizers. However, apart from price and color, does the filler have no impact on aspects such as the preparation of the slurry, as well as the particle gloss and roundness of the finished product?
Apart from price and color, does the filler have no impact on aspects such as the preparation of the slurry, as well as the particle gloss and roundness of the finished product? Strictly speaking, the filler affects the particle gloss and roundness of the finished product, whereas particle gloss and roundness are merely for sensory evaluation.
Color is merely an intuitive indication of appearance; it seems to have no impact on the internal quality
Judging people by their appearance can never be eliminated