Comparison of urea melter placement at the bottom or top of the tower
Thread Content
It is reported that for urine-based compound fertilizer production units, the urea melter is located at the bottom of the tower in some units, while it is placed on top of the tower in other units. Please discuss: What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
For urine-based compound fertilizer production units, the urea melter is located at the bottom of the tower in some devices, while it is placed on top of the tower in others. The advantages and disadvantages are as follows: Advantages of locating it at the bottom of the tower: 1. More space is available, which facilitates maintenance. 2. It allows for an increase in production capacity. Disadvantage: Precise control of the urine temperature is required in the design； Sudden power outages can cause urine to clog the pipes. Advantages of the tower: 1. The temperature control design is simple; 2. Flow control is relatively precise. Disadvantages: Transporting urea to the tower becomes more difficult, making it hard to increase production capacity
Uro-based is probably okay, but nitro-based won’t work