The function of reduced-diameter flanges
Thread Content
This post was last edited by penryn on 2010-10-22 at 19:05. The function of a reduced-diameter flange is somewhat similar to that of a tees fitting; if it really served the same purpose as a tees fitting, wouldn’t that be a waste of material?
In practice, this structure is commonly used in engineering to handle areas where a change in diameter is required.
Used when there isn’t enough space and the large and small parts simply can’t be fitted in. For such strange and unusual gadgets, I would definitely refuse to use them if there were other ways to solve the problem
This is quite rare; is it non-standard?
Similar items such as reducers and elbows come with standards, all of which are designed to save space; generally, their use is avoided as it involves complicated procurement processes
1. The resistance loss is relatively high; 2. The sealing performance is poor; 3. There are significant limitations in its application; 4. There are considerations related to procurement; 5. It is used occasionally in some special situations.
It should be avoided as much as possible, mainly due to space installation considerations.
When connecting to the equipment nozzle, using a reducing flange looks better; it’s not really a waste. There are no principles involved; everyone should do as they please.
Link: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/viewthread.php?tid=628627