How to cultivate **useful talents? I was puzzled

This post was last edited by pengshijun1975 on 2010-10-28 at 22:27. For most people, they will have to rely on work to support their families in the future; therefore, skills are far more important than educational qualifications. The problem is that educational qualifications serve as a stepping stone – without them it’s not possible to get started, but even with them they don’t necessarily bring much benefit

Is the second floor promoting the idea that reading is useless?

I agree with the third floor – we need to study hard, read more books, and read good books. After obtaining a bachelor’s degree, one should pursue a master’s degree; after that, a doctorate. After finishing grad school, one should become a warrior, and after that, a heroic warrior. All these are things like supporting one’s family or using education as a stepping stone. Please, moderators, do not mislead the young people of our socialist motherland – the communist cause still needs their contributions. . .

It is a blessing for the country and for the people to cultivate young people who are brave enough to compete, willing to compete, unafraid of setbacks or failures, and possess a sense of the rule of law.

In fact, university is merely general education, providing the basic theories of various industries. University provides us with a relatively free platform, allowing us to try things we never had the opportunity to experience before and to find what we like or what suits us. If your accumulation is deep enough, you may reach higher positions in society.

During those years in China, people saw that the United States was making rapid progress in technology, had many products developed through independent innovation, and its workforce had a high level of competence. This was because the U.S. had a large number of university graduates with high overall qualifications, which led to extensive training and an increase in enrollment. But no one considered the fact that in China most industries are of a low-level nature; with so many highly qualified and educated people, many of them cannot find jobs, as their skills do not match the requirements of the jobs available. The problem is that China does not need such a large number of university graduates. It’s not that you’re not competent – if you’re a boss, you can hire either university graduates or migrant workers for the same job, and since migrant workers cost less, who would you choose to hire? So, don’t doubt China’s education system; it’s the party’s policies that are the problem. What China lacks at the moment is a sense of nationality, a spirit; it’s a pity to think about when this will be possible.

During those years in China, people saw that the United States was making rapid progress in technology, had many products developed through independent innovation, and its workforce had a high level of competence. This was because the U.S. had a large number of university graduates with high overall qualifications, which led to extensive training and an increase in enrollment. But no one considered the fact that in China most industries are of a low-level nature; with so many highly qualified and educated people, many of them cannot find jobs, as their skills do not match the requirements of the jobs available. The problem is that China does not need such a large number of university graduates. It’s not that you’re not competent – if you’re a boss, you can hire either university graduates or migrant workers for the same job, and since migrant workers cost less, who would you choose to hire? So, don’t doubt China’s education system; it’s the party’s policies that are the problem. What China lacks at the moment is a sense of nationality, a spirit; it’s a pity to think about when this will be possible.

Reading is necessary, but it’s not the only path one can take

When studying*, don’t forget to remember how to conduct yourself in society. Apply what you have learned.