A domestic coal chemical company has spent billions over several years, yet it still has not started operations!
Thread Content
The last edit to this post was made by ChinaDangZiqiang on 2013-2-3 at 12:51. Recently, a coal chemical plant located in a desert area of China announced that it had successfully started up operations. Could those in the know discuss this?
Reply to 1# China must strengthen itself. The original poster seems to know some insider information – which company is it exactly?
Hehe, this kind of situation is quite common these days!
If you know the situation, tell everyone! Ask the specific question you want to ask. It seems like you know the situation, but you don’t explain it clearly and instead ask others to analyze it – why is that? Who can analyze it clearly!
This post was last edited by China must strengthen itself on 2010-11-4 at 10:17. This is just an individual case, but it is hoped that it remains just that – an individual case. If all our state-owned enterprises are like this, China’s future will be ruined. Experts have discussed at length the various drawbacks of state-owned enterprises. I remember someone saying that, from the perspective of corporate operation models, Chinese state-owned enterprises should not be capable of generating profits; they cannot have the ability to create their own revenue. In reality, they are able to make profits due to monopoly. That makes sense! The example I’m giving is one that I believe some people are aware of; it’s not appropriate to name them. There is considerable internal strife within this company, with a strict hierarchy and a lot of internal conflict. It was inevitable that things would reach this point. At another company, I also heard that they forced the machines to operate for some non-economic reasons, which led to damage to the equipment. These are all things I don’t want to see. I truly hope that all state-owned enterprises in China can operate entirely in accordance with economic and technical principles, without letting administrative interference override objective realities.
Is it Shenhua? The length of your post does not meet the requirements. Current length: 12 bytes. System limit: 16 to 158,000 bytes
I don’t think it can be called deception; after all, we need to look at the long term, and I’m willing to allow mistakes to be made.
Reply to 8# wei*nmack: It’s not a Myth Company; it’s a Toronto-based company. The burners had not all been ignited when the plant was shut down due to a malfunction in the moving equipment
Is it the shell coal pressurized gasification technology?
Running a business in China according to market principles? Do you really want to start a business?