Flue gas desulfurization technology
Thread Content
It is understood that at least half of the companies in China fail to meet the standards for flue gas desulfurization. There are many adverse factors. First, the failure to meet environmental standards has an adverse impact. Second, for desulfurization companies, the final payment will not be released if they fail to meet the standards. Third, it will affect the desulfurization company’s ability to obtain future projects. If all the projects you complete are of high quality, and you use them as examples for future clients to see, it will be very helpful for you in securing new projects. Ten of your sentences are not worth one sentence from a user. In fact, flue gas desulfurization depends on the process, as well as on the reform and innovation of the equipment. Regarding the equipment, the desulfurization company where I used to work did have its own unique features; it was able to achieve a desulfurization level of 50 mg/m3 by using wet desulfurization methods. Large power plants lack experience in conducting tests, but small and medium-sized boilers work fine, with a desulfurization rate of over 90%. This industry is quite good, though there are restrictions on my ability to develop within it. So I left this industry, but in order to help promote the technology. If that company or person needs the information, please send an email to tuoliujishu@163.com
Can’t the wet flue gas desulfurization technology be shared with everyone? Email: ynfqqj@163.com
By using sodium carbonate for absorption, the waste liquid can be recycled to extract sodium sulfite.
Oh, then chemical-related fields are more suitable, I guess~
The manufacturing process should be fairly simple; it is designed based on chemical equations. I believe that most companies have their own calculation methods, and these methods are more or less similar across different companies. However, whether it meets the standards depends on whether there have been improvements to the device; what I know are the secrets related to that device
Reply to 5# wondenfultime: It’s mainly the equipment, not the process
The process is similar to everyone else’s; there are just some differences in the equipment. I hope we can exchange ideas with each other
90% desulfurization efficiency? ? ? Now at least 95% is required.
I’m looking for one; what more advanced options are there than wet flue gas desulfurization for 358423729@qq.com? Refer to pneumatic emulsion desulfurization tower
Reply to 10# zhuzhou*nglong: There’s nothing more advanced than that; it’s just that some companies fail to meet the standards. Those that do meet the standards don’t need to be compared. If you can meet the standards, then there’s no need for comparison at all