Which is better, the Yokogawa CS3000 or Honeywell’s system?
Thread Content
Dear colleagues, which is better to use, the Yokogawa CS3000 or Honeywell’s systems? Our company operates in the chlor-alkali and PVC industries!
This post was last edited by liuei on 2010-12-6 at 23:57. Any of them can be used in terms of technology; HONEYWELL is a better choice. One can make an assessment by looking at the quotes for similar situations. Major chemical plants in China that use new technologies also opt for HONEYWELL. For DCS maintenance personnel, those who have not used HONEYWELL systems may find it difficult to get started, but once they master it, they will realize that it is much superior to other systems. The Yokogawa CS3000 is more suitable for instrument technicians in factories that do not have specialized DCS staff!
I feel it works well; the main issue is *habit
Reply to 2# liuei: I think what you said is too far-fetched. What does \"better\" mean? I think they each have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of hardware, while when it comes to software usage, it depends on what people are used to!
I haven’t used Honeywell’s new system. Comparing the CS3000 and TPS, both systems are quite good. The hardware of TPS is slightly more expensive, and its structure is also more complex. If FF and management systems are used, the CS3000 is better.
Honeywell is more suitable for those with strong computer skills; both companies offer good products
Actually, whether it’s useful or not depends on which one you’re proficient in using – the one you master well is the one that’s useful. My company uses CS3000 as well, in the chlor-alkali industry, and I think it’s very useful
It’s impossible to tell them apart this clearly; just get used to using *. A friend told me that TPS is more stable, while PKS is slightly inferior. From an application perspective, Yokogawa is fine and easy to get started with.
I have used Honeywell’s TDC-300, TPS, and EPKS, as well as Yokogawa’s CS-1000 and CS-3000. Personally, I think Yokogawa’s products are relatively more stable, have fewer faults, and are cheaper; whereas Honeywell’s products offer more powerful functions and are better suited for management purposes.
If there are too many data points in Honeywell’s PKS system, the speed at which the data is refreshed is relatively slow. It’s easier for beginners to get started with Honeywell’s systems
The Yokogawa CS-3000 is still easier to use; no training is required, and with a little guidance one can configure it on their own.