Who uses it, who manages it
Thread Content
This post was last edited by lyhh9024 on 2010-12-14 08:07. Our company’s fire safety management system includes a rule stating that the person who uses a fire-fighting device is also responsible for its maintenance. I would like to ask fellow members: which law does this principle originate from? Regulations? Standard? Specifications?
The principle of \"whoever uses it is responsible for its management\" is stipulated in fire safety management systems by many departments; as for which law it is derived from? Regulations? Standard? Specifications? Not clear!
Reply 1# wps198682: The user is responsible for management, that is, they must bear the consequences resulting from the failure or inability to use fire protection facilities due to improper management and maintenance. Who do you think should be responsible for management? Who should bear this responsibility on behalf of the user? As for the legal regulation that meets this requirement, it is the Fire Protection Law: Article 14 Agencies, organizations, enterprises, and institutions shall fulfill the following fire safety responsibilities: (1) Formulate fire safety systems and operating procedures for fire safety ； . \9 `3 r& G( _* j C (II) Implement a fire safety responsibility system by identifying the persons responsible for fire safety within the organization and in its various departments and positions ； (III) Conduct fire safety education and publicity for employees in light of the characteristics of the unit ； % R6 ?! q- o F6 s c) L (IV) Conduct fire prevention inspections to eliminate potential fire hazards promptly ； (5) Install fire-fighting facilities and equipment in accordance with **relevant regulations, set up fire-safety signs, and organize regular inspections and maintenance to ensure that such facilities and equipment are in good condition and functional ； * ?1 Z 1 z3 I) V% w$ a 7 a) ]- k# l+ v- K (VI) Ensure that evacuation routes and safety exits remain unobstructed, and install fire safety evacuation signs that comply with **relevant regulations.
Personally, I think unified management is better, along with designating a person responsible for maintenance!