Thread Content
For mass flowmeters, which is more suitable for users: Micro Motion or E+H? Micro Motion offers good quality, but its price and customer service are not satisfactory. E+H is also excellent, with reasonable prices; I encourage everyone to provide more evaluations of the products from these two companies.
The most important thing is to choose either a flow meter or one that suits your operating conditions; if it cannot meet those conditions, then no matter how good it is, it will not be suitable.
E+H offers a good price and service
I can learn about the AK balanced flow meter
OP, we usually use E+H now; before, it was the original German version, which was extremely expensive. Later, it was produced in Suzhou, and the price dropped. Overall, both the price level and the quality of service are determined by the agents, so it is necessary to strive for favorable terms when making purchases.
It depends on the operating conditions and what exactly is being measured in order to make a comparison
From what I’ve used, E+H is better; it’s cheaper than Gaon
This post was last edited by qugd on 2010-12-19 09:46. There are now many manufacturers of mass flow meters; in addition to Rosemount’s HighAccuracy models, companies such as E+H, Yokogawa, Coriolis, ABB, and Siemens also produce mass flow meters. Mass flow meters are generally chosen for trade handovers, precise process control, etc. Firstly, it is necessary to select the appropriate diameter, range, material, functions, etc., based on the user’s own processing conditions and operating procedures. As for service and support, I believe any brand manufacturer will provide good quality. However, when purchasing through distributors or agents, various problems can arise, as many agents are motivated by making a profit and then leaving, and coupled with certain drawbacks in corporate procurement, this often results in spending more money without receiving good service or support. To discuss the price of a set of measuring instruments without considering whether their specifications and models are identical is a sign of lack of knowledge about such instruments. Only instruments with the same specifications and applications, under the same commercial terms, can have comparable prices.
··············· Support the 9th floor!
For applications where precision is crucial and great attention is paid to measurement results, High Precision’s CMF is the ideal choice. It can be used either for reference within the system or for internal settlement within a company. Gaon has a wide range of quality levels; E+H is slightly inferior, followed by Cologne.
I think E+H is quite useful. Emerson’s are good too