HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Steam jet compressors (heat pumps) and gas ejectors (steam ejectors): various calculation methods and designs

2011-01-04View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by jklsg123 on 2012-4-1 23:18. Jet heaters: steam-jet type and water-jet type. Currently, the steam-jet type is mostly used, but in some cases the water-jet type is required. There is no formula for the water-jet type; experiments must be conducted before it can be applied. Such algorithms are also different from the algorithms of the American Heat Exchanger Association. The main issue to be addressed is noise, and the core of the design lies in shock waves. Simulation systems can certainly address this issue to a large extent, but empirical formulas are still needed.
Reply #22011-01-05
Reply to 2# Pigs are also treasures. If calculation is needed, you can send over the parameters!
Reply #32011-01-05
Welcome to my blog: http://xtkjd.blog.163.com, where you can find a range of injector devices manufactured by us.
Reply #42011-01-05
Welcome to my blog: http://xtkjd.blog.163.com, which features a range of ejector devices
Reply #52011-07-09
Not bad; I hope to see the original poster’s summary of previous formulas and an analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. The Mollie diagram mentioned by the original poster is actually a entropy-enthalpy diagram for steam; it indeed represents a relatively simple and feasible method of calculation. It assumes that both the nozzle and the pressure-boosting tube operate under isentropic conditions, and then the isentropic efficiency is applied. There are examples of such calculations in textbooks on chemical thermodynamics, but these methods rely on many empirical parameters. There are several other formulas designed for saturated superheated steam, and the results obtained using these formulas vary. I look forward to seeing the original poster’s comparison of these methods – but at the end of the day, they all stem from the formulas related to the speed of sound and the calculations for supercritical flow
Reply #62011-07-11
This post was last edited and replied to by jklsg123 on 2012-4-1 23:17. Reply 7# dawnchuck: Of course, at present the ejector can have its injection coefficient calculated based on real gases; in other words, several velocity coefficients change depending on the working conditions, rather than being the constant velocity coefficients shown in the formulas.
Reply #72012-05-23
There are very few literature sources on the design calculations for ejectors that use natural gas to eject liquids, and no standards exist either. Are there any methods available? If you know anyone, please help!
Reply #82020-06-21
Hello, I am interested in low-pressure steam ejectors with a pressure of only 0.2~0.3 MPa

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.