Thread Content
The catalyst flow in the following lift, namely lift B (from the 1st to the 2nd reactor), is then adjusted through the relevant PDV in order to maintain the catalyst level in the first upper hopper. The cascade LIC/PDV is then activated (LIC on the first upper hopper, PDV on the second lift). It should also be noted that this cascade can be overridden by a cascade from the second upper hopper, should the catalyst level in this third upper hopper reach a specified very high value. How should the red-colored parts be translated? ?
Note also that this cascade can be overridden by a cascade from the second upper hopper, should the catalyst level in this 3rd upper hopper reach a selected high high level value. It should also be noted that this connection may fail in the second feed hopper, resulting in a very high catalyst content in the third feed hopper.
This post was last edited by tigerli358_Can on 2011-1-12 00:14. Additional reference: The key here is the understanding of SHOULD; in this context, SHOULD should mean “IF” or “WHEN”, indicating a condition or assumption. It is recommended to translate as: Once the level in the third hopper of the catalyst feed bin (from LIC) reaches the set HHL,.... (PDV is required. . . )
Thank you to both! I personally lean towards the idea of the third floor. This is how I translated it: Note that when the material level in the third high-level hopper reaches a high level, this cascade control will be replaced by the cascade signal coming from the second high-level hopper. But I’m still not entirely sure, all because I didn’t learn grammar well in school. . .
This post was last edited by tigerli358_Can on 2011-1-13 at 11:52. Please avoid criticism: it’s just my personal opinion. Accurate translation relies on two prerequisites: first, an understanding of the relevant processing technologies, which is fundamental; second, an understanding of vocabulary and grammar. If one is not familiar with the relevant field, one has to rely on basic English skills to figure things out. For example, many people who work in translation cannot be familiar with all techniques. There are several professional translators on this forum who are very modest, and their approach is worth learning from. Should-shall is also very common in hypotheses as well as in legal texts. For example, when it comes to implicit warnings, words like if are generally not used: If you come again later, (actions)…. That is, if you are late again. . .