HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issues regarding the secondary current of electric tar collectors

2011-02-28View Original

Thread Content

We have a honeycomb electrostatic precipitator with a processing capacity of 36,000 M3/H; it has 160 honeycomb units. The operating parameters recorded recently were: secondary voltage of 38 KV and secondary current of 155 mA. But recently, after parking the machine and performing a steam cleaning of its core, the readings once it was started up were 39–40 KV, with a secondary current of 125 mA. Is this secondary current value normal, according to everyone? What is the reason for the reduction? What is the impact of a reduced current on the operation of the equipment?
Reply #22011-03-02
The resistance is high; Is it a coking plant? Try spraying it with the remaining ammonia solution.
Reply #32011-03-02
After steam purging, the voltage increased slightly, while the current decreased a bit. Based on the data, the electrostatic tar remover performs well; its tar removal efficiency should be high, so there is no need to worry.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.