Thread Content
After completing each task, conduct a self-review: if a fault was resolved, the summary should include the following points: 1. Occurrence of the problem: Who discovered it – through process notifications, inspections, or instructions from management, etc. 2. Causes: The reasons behind the problem, analyzed from various perspectives such as processes, equipment, and human factors; PS: It’s important to first understand the basic principles of processes and equipment. 3. Methods: The methods used to resolve this problem, whether there were alternative methods, and any other techniques employed during the task. 4. Spare parts used: What materials or spare parts were used, why the problem occurred, and whether there are any alternative replacements. 5. Summary: Does this problem occur frequently? Are there any preventive measures? Are there any areas for technical improvement?
Thank you, OP. It indeed should be done this way; let’s learn together and make progress together
Yes, working with instruments requires knowing too many things. One needs to know something about processes, machinery, and electricity
I persisted for a while; as someone once said, among the various methods through which human civilizations can progress, inductive reasoning is the most scientific methodology
After each task, take some time to summarize it, expand your thinking, and it’s best to keep a record of it. Over time, this will yield significant benefits. The original poster’s method is good.
Actually, I think working with instruments involves asking questions, thinking, observing, checking, and then taking action. Step 1: When a problem arises, it is necessary to carefully inquire whether there has been a change in the manufacturing process or if there are other reasons for it. Step two: is to think carefully about whether similar problems have been dealt with before or how to proceed. Step three: Once at the site, observe whether there have been any changes in the status of the instruments. For example, check whether there is leakage in the three-valve assembly of the transmitter, whether the air pressure supplied to the valves is insufficient, or if there are any other leaks that can be detected visually or by touch. Step 4: Make some judgments based on the parameters of the instrument. The fifth step is to put into practice what you have summarized earlier.
The introduction is clear; I’ve learned it, thank you