Contracting method for LNG liquefaction process package
Thread Content
The process packages for LNG liquefaction plants utilize foreign proprietary technologies, and the foreign technology suppliers have cooperative engineering companies in China. The scope of the tender for the process package now includes patented technologies, basic design, as well as proprietary equipment. Should these contracts be signed separately or together? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach?
Reply 1# bluebridge: It isn’t important whether contracts are signed separately; it depends on the owner’s technical capabilities. Our company has extensive experience in this area; if you are interested, we can discuss it further.
It’s better to stay together; usually, it involves a process package along with proprietary equipment. Otherwise, some manufacturers won’t provide you with all the necessary information, and it will be you who suffers as a result.
That’s the money one can earn; there are only a few companies capable of producing the process packages for liquefaction plants.
Reply to 2# wu521yy: Hello, may I ask which company you work for? What specific area of work does your company deal with? Are there any successful examples in the country? Maybe we can talk about it
Reply to 6# sonid: That’s not correct; I work in process-related tasks at an LNG plant. I saw your message; we can talk
It is recommended to give him the package as a whole, as this also ensures proper after-sales support