What is a good thing to do downstream of MTO?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by jordan569 on 2013-1-6 at 20:18. Let’s discuss what would be a good route for MTO downstream; Shenhua is currently focusing on polyolefins, and it seems that this approach yields decent results. Do you think there are any better alternatives? . Note $ # , $ $
The polyolefin market offers great potential; it features a short production process and easy storage and transportation of products, making it an excellent product option for coal chemical enterprises in remote areas.
If PX resources are available, ethylene can be used to produce ethylene glycol (EG), which can then be used to manufacture polyester (PET)
Reply to 3# Haituo: Why not produce ethylene glycol directly from coal?
This post was last edited by poxun0770 on 2011-4-8 23:13. The polyester route is quite good – it offers high added value and there is a large market for it. PX and coal coking should also be feasible; those involved in the chemical industry should be able to carry this out as well. Could Haiduo elaborate on this so that we can learn from it? Actually, Walnut is right too; it’s also one possible route
Reply to 4# Fresh walnuts: The manufacturing process is not yet mature, and the catalyst issue has not been effectively resolved.
Reply to 6# hj9909: Why say that? Hehe
It seems that there isn’t much effort being put into the downstream development of olefins. It would be worthwhile to consider using olefins as a starting point for synthesizing resins and rubbers, and then integrating this with the silicone industry – this could hold promising prospects. It’s just my personal opinion; I hope everyone can offer their feedback.