Some issues with enamel reactors
Thread Content
Are there any mandatory requirements in the standards for enamel reactors across different eras to replace the previous standard? It has been found that there are always slight differences between the model sizes of enamel kettle manufacturers and the standard sizes. It’s unclear what standard enamel kettle they are using. Moreover, the weight of the enamel-lined reactors produced by these manufacturers is even less than that of the standard reactors without enamel lining or motors. How can I use this as a reference?
Firstly, the 92 standard is being followed at present, which means that the holes in the end caps are straight holes. Secondly, it’s true that there are variations in model and size, but the accurate way to calculate is based on L units, such as 1000L or 2000L. Lighter weights may be achieved by using thin steel plates, or it may be designed that way according to the drawings; generally, custom orders specify requirements regarding plate thickness or pressure