Survey on the revision of the “One Question per Day in the Tower Area” format
Thread Content
In response to the suggestions from the editorial team regarding the reform of the \"Question of the Day\" feature, a survey on this reform will be conducted in our area, with opinions sought from the public. We invite all members to participate actively! Every participant gets a reward! If you have any other ideas, please reply here with a follow-up post; those replies will receive double rewards! Here are my thoughts: Based on my experience in creating questions over the past two months, a revision is feasible; as for increasing the number of questions, further investigation within the forum would be necessary! We shouldn’t rush into making changes; instead, we should involve all the members of Haichuan. This way, we will have input from both our management team and members at all levels of Haichuan. Of course, we can adopt a periodic approach, such as using a quarter or a year as a cycle. Within each cycle, the questions for each day can be categorized based on their style, topic, or difficulty on a weekly or daily basis. One month before the end of a cycle, we can solicit suggestions regarding the direction and style of the questions for the next cycle, in order to elevate the quality of these daily questions and turn them into a ‘brand’ for our forum! This also aligns with the original intention of the super-edition update! Personal opinion!
It is hoped that questions for which answers can be easily found based on standard guidelines will not be used; instead, questions related to specific aspects of actual tower design, processes, and production are preferred. Greater rewards should be offered for correct answers, so as to provide more people with the opportunity to learn.
Connect more with reality and hold more discussions! ! !
The focus is on participation – anything related to towers will do. The goal is to increase awareness among everyone; if the difficulty level is too high, it might dampen people’s enthusiasm.
Be practical, not obscure； More common knowledge points are provided, which can boost everyone’s enthusiasm for participation
The topic should progress from simple to more complex. Start from the basics. It can also conveniently help improve the professional skills of participants. It is important to have a solid foundation in basic knowledge. Personal opinion
The number of questions isn’t important; one or two per day is sufficient, so that everyone can learn in a relaxed manner. Learning a little every day will also yield significant results over time. Multiple-choice questions are not recommended. When answering questions, explain the process; rewards will be given based on the content
For the questions, it is possible to periodically include ones that combine basic knowledge with practical application knowledge. Both aspects are needed. Only in this way can the majority of people be taken care of.
The focus should be on finding questions that are relevant to reality, including those that are familiar to everyone but still require careful consideration when answering them. For example, what changes in certain parameters affect other parameters, the size of trays and the types of overflow systems, the porosity rate, the F factor, and what effects different changes can have. Answers should be given by relating these concepts to real-world situations. Avoid discussing things that few people have even heard of; focus instead on topics that are widely used in engineering. . .
The questions posed should give participants ample room to express themselves! ................
It’s better to be relevant to reality, right? It’s a learning tool for beginners and a way to reinforce knowledge for those who are already experienced~ Just my opinion~:lol