Thread Content
The more one travels and observes, the more one thinks. Nowadays, management practices are increasingly aligned with 6S standards, and equipment such as pipes and valves is required to have identification tags! I wonder what everyone’s opinions are? ? ? Let me talk about mine first: first, it is clear and straightforward; second, it prevents accidental operation and increases safety; third, it facilitates management.
There’s another very important aspect: it makes things look good for the leaders when they come to check it… Hehe, that’s also a crucial point. .
It’s best to have a color-coded system, so that the main path, auxiliary paths, and levels of danger can be distinguished by color :)
Well, that’s good; it’s a good opportunity to give some suggestions for our company
It wastes resources and money, just to facilitate inspections by superiors
:Does lol have a style? Our company is also doing these things. . . . . .
If it is for safety reasons, such as with oxygen valves, a brightly colored warning sign indicating that the device must not be touched should be installed. The rest, which are only there to meet inspection requirements and have no real value, are indeed a waste of time and money.
It’s a waste of time and money – it’s something that chemical plants do. I only trust myself; who made those labels? Has anyone verified that? Working according to the instructions usually doesn’t cause any problems; but when issues do arise, they seem to be rather absurd and impossible to occur. I’d rather spend a bit more time checking things myself before starting to work!
Our factory mandates standardized customization, requiring that the label information include the valve model, the medium flowing through it, the manufacturer, and the installation date.
Attach labels and locks to prevent problems before they occur; don’t think it’s a hassle – prevention is very important.
It’s school time again; it’s the first grade at Haichuan Primary School