Thread Content
Given China’s abundance of coal and shortage of oil and gas, new technologies for the efficient and economical utilization of lignite are crucial for China’s energy security.
Just give it a try: New technology is significant for China’s energy efficiency, as it helps optimize the use of lignite due to the current lack of oil and gas.
Add a For at the beginning of the sentence.
Given China’s abundance of coal and shortage of oil and gas, new technologies for the efficient and economical utilization of lignite are crucial for China’s energy security. In my humble opinion: the sentence structure has an inconsistent relationship between the subject and the subordinate clause. Such questions are common in exams, and they are one of the most difficult errors to detect. The subject of the main clause is new technologies, while the subject of the subordinate clause \"being abundant in coal and lacking in oil and gas in China\" is clearly not new technologies; it should be China. In other words, the original sentence should be two sentences: China is abundant in coal but lacks oil and gas; / New technologies to utilize lignite efficiently and economically are important for China’s energy security. The subjects of these two sentences are different, so the way it was written by the poster is incorrect in an exam setting. The original sentence can be revised to: Given its abundance of coal and shortage of oil and gas, China needs new technologies to utilize lignite efficiently and economically, as these technologies are crucial for China’s energy security. I’m not sure if this is correct I would also appreciate it if experts could provide feedback.