HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Dry desulfurization

2011-05-19View Original

Thread Content

I would like to ask which is more cost-effective in dry desulfurization: zinc oxide desulfurizers or the current iron-manganese desulfurizers. Iron-manganese desulfurizers require heating for reduction, but they are cheaper; Zinc oxide is expensive, but it can be used for a long time without the need for heating or reduction; please share your opinions
Reply #22011-05-19
Both are needed; zinc oxide is used for filtration, and normal-temperature zinc oxide is also required before it enters the synthesis tower
Reply #32011-05-20
Zinc oxide is a bit more effective, but it’s relatively expensive; it has a high sulfur capacity, offering good desulfurization results. It can be used directly without the need for reduction, and no passivation is required when replacing it

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.