Question: Why is the CS3000 system considered a truly open-system architecture?

2011-06-10View Original

Thread Content

I would like to ask the teachers why, whenever the Yokogawa CS3000 is mentioned, it is said to be a system with truly open architecture?

Reply #22011-06-10

Oh~ Hehe, I looked around in the forum; it seems to be because it can be connected to third-party systems or devices through standard interfaces. I wonder if it stops here?

Reply #32011-06-13

It seems that Yokogawa cannot communicate (read and write) with DCS systems from other manufacturers easily, and the same issue exists with other manufacturers as well. Yokogawa seems to have developed a new SIOS; I’m not sure about the details.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Question: Why is the CS3000 system considered a truly open-system architecture?

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links