Thread Content
During communication, it’s inevitable that there will be different opinions; where there is one view, there is also another, and disagreements are bound to arise. How are such incorrect answers scored? Should there be no scoring, or should points be deducted slightly for less correct responses? Or should it be treated equally to the correct answer? Everyone, please share your scoring criteria.
Reply to 1# Light as a swallow: Right and wrong should be viewed dialectically; some issues indeed need to be debated. Of course, if it’s a principled error, such as an incorrect piece of data, one can reply to point out the mistake or provide the correct data. As for other discussion-based issues, it’s better to let everyone argue more about them.
I think as long as it’s not meant to disrupt things, and people participate seriously by expressing their own opinions, they should be rewarded. If everyone already knows their own views are correct, then there’s no need for discussion. For those who cause disruptions, warnings or removal of their posts suffice; those with incorrect opinions shouldn’t have their scores reduced, and those who make extreme claims can simply be given no score at all. Personal opinion:$
A small amount of points can be given to users with a lower rank to encourage them to speak up; For SeaFriends with a higher rank, no additional points are usually given.
In my opinion, as long as one participates in the discussion and engages at a certain depth, points should be awarded regardless of whether the answer is right or wrong; in fact, if the discussion is thorough, it can even be considered equivalent to a correct answer.
Participated in the discussion about giving appropriate scores to everyone. Unless it is an obvious mistake or error that can be formally brought to attention. For the rest, moderators can express their own opinions to help the original poster choose the appropriate answer.
I agree with the view of the moderator on floor 6 who said it’s as light as a swallow. As the old saying goes, \"Let a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend.\" As long as people engage in active discussions and exchanges, they should be given appropriate rewards; this should be the responsibility of the moderators. As for whether the content of the post is right or wrong, that should be left to the users; through their discussions, it is believed that one can determine the answer.