Let’s talk about the fact that ensuring everyone has milk to drink is more important than milk standards”
Thread Content
Today, upon reading the insightful views of the directors of the Inner Mongolia Dairy Association, I was stunned; it felt as though I had been taken back to the period of three years of natural disasters, or as if I were living in Africa. Having worked in quality for so many years, I really can’t understand such lofty views. Please share your genuine feelings after reading this!
It is precisely this attitude of seeming responsible but being actually irresponsible that has led to the quality crisis in the dairy industry.
It is said that after the end of the world, only two species will remain on Earth: cockroaches and Chinese people. So having enough milk to drink is a way to boost physical strength, regardless of whether it meets certain standards or not. :P
This is a typical Chinese approach of focusing on quantity rather than quality.
Reply to 4# hfwsd5624685: The result of quantitative change is qualitative change.
Will there be more melamine?
Such insightful views are hard to agree with; I guess I’ll just have nothing to drink then
It’s likely that trimers will not appear again, but based on the wisdom of the Chinese people, new substitutes will emerge in a few years
Reply to 3# yusea: Adding water to milk results in a decrease in nitrogen content； To control the addition of water, a minimum nitrogen content was set, which in turn led to the widespread use of melamine... It can’t be said that the intention was wrong; it’s all about money. If there are policies above, there will be countermeasures below. For every inch the virtue advances, the evil advances an inch as well! Therefore, to be an honest official and a supervisor, one must be even more deceitful than unscrupulous merchants in order to do the job well. Just sitting in an air-conditioned room, without conducting proper research or considering all aspects and practicalities, will only lead to more serious consequences, and such actions will surely be condemned by one’s conscience. Of course, this is on the condition of having a conscience, of having a human heart rather than serving the RMB.
Reply to 9# mickelfeng: In fact, are there that few food-related problems we face? Sudan dyes, clenbuterol, recycled cooking oil, melamine – all of these are the result of actions carried out by highly intelligent people; it’s the kind of service provided by those who have received proper training and education. That’s fine too; for Chinese people, this is a form of free training, only the cost is a bit high. Interest is supreme!
Reply to 10# yusea: It’s tragic that it is the people with low and middle incomes who bear the costs, and this trend is growing. This aligns with the pure biological principles of survival of the fittest, yet the education one receives from a young age is completely the opposite of this. Reality shatters bit by bit, day by day, the systems of morality, values, life, world, and so on that are built up from birth – what a tragic helplessness!