HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Selection of catalytic cracking termination

2011-07-08View Original

Thread Content

We have a catalytic cracking unit with an annual processing capacity of 600,000 tons; there are two terminator nozzles at the upper part of the riser – one for crude gasoline and straight-run gasoline, and the other for acidic water. Everyone, please help – why is a terminator nozzle needed? What are the advantages and disadvantages of these terminators? ? ?
Reply #22011-07-08
Acidic water is the best. It will not cause secondary cracking of crude gasoline.
Reply #32011-07-08
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/15955f4ffe4733687e21aa8e.html Analysis of the issues related to terminators!
Reply #42011-07-08
It’s best not to add any terminator, as this will lead to increased energy consumption~~~ If the reaction time is long and adjusting the reaction temperature does not improve the distribution of the product, it is possible to consider adding a smaller amount of terminator; be sure to use only a small amount~~~ With a well-designed lift tube, there is no need to add a terminator~~~

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.