Which is more accurate for heat exchanger design, LANSYS 1.2 or sw6?

2011-07-15View Original

Thread Content

Which is more accurate for heat exchanger design, LANSYS 1.2 or sw6?

Reply #22011-07-15

SW6 is much better than LANSYS 1.2; some components are available in SW6 but not in LANSYS 1.2, such as elbows

Reply #32011-07-15

. . . Theoretically, if all values are 151 and all have passed certification, which one will be more accurate? Also, it seems that more units use SW6.

Reply #42011-07-15

When it comes to heat exchanger modules, Lansys is superior to SW6, as the organization behind Lansys is highly skilled in this area. A long time ago, SW6 did not take into account the actual yield strength of materials when calculating expansion joints. And Lansys is available

Reply #52018-03-30

In terms of heat exchanger modules, LANSYS is superior to SW6

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Quick Links