HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Exchange on processes, technologies, and operational status of renewable sulfur dioxide removal

2011-07-20View Original

Thread Content

There are already several systems for renewable sulfur dioxide removal in operation across the country; how is their performance?
Reply #22011-07-20
I have seen several sodium-alkali-based desulfurization systems, and their operating costs are extremely high; for a smoke volume of 100,000 units per year, the operating cost amounts to 10 million yuan (after deducting the revenue from selling sodium sulfite)
Reply #32011-07-21
Reply to 2# zhuzhou*nglong: How is the system performing? Is the system clogged? What are the problems?
Reply #42011-07-24
This post was last edited and replied to by zhuzhou*nglong on 2011-7-24 at 17:44. Reply 3# renyi7552: There is no clogging, as sodium hydroxide is used for desulfurization. The by-product sodium sulfite can be converted into a product for sale. Disadvantages: The initial investment is approximately 3 times that of the conventional lime-gypsum method, and the operating costs are also about 3 to 5 times higher.
Reply #52011-07-24
Of course, it depends on economies of scale – is there any bottleneck in the production process? Do you know anything about this?
Reply #62011-07-25
I know a fair bit about it, and I also know where the blockage is. Blockages mainly occur in the centrifuge and the crystallization reactor sections; there are also some blockages in the material pipelines. After it was put into use, it was modified many times; debugging took about two years. Initially, the sodium hydrosulfite content was only 40–50%, but now it can reach around 90%. You can go and take a look at the Zhuzhou Smelting Plant
Reply #72012-08-22
What is the SO2 concentration in the exhaust gases from the Zhuzhou Smelting Plant? Whether it is cost-effective is the key.
Reply #82012-08-24
Operating costs: with a smoke volume of 100,000, the annual operating cost amounts to 10 million. Is it really that high? It seems that our magnesium-based method is indeed low-cost!
Reply #92015-11-11
Could you talk about organic amines? How about Panzhihua?
Reply #102015-11-11
If you’re interested, we can discuss it in more depth.
Reply #112015-11-28
Is the activated carbon adsorption method useful?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.