HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

How should one choose a level gauge in such a situation?

2011-07-29View Original

Thread Content

Mine is an evaporation kettle, vacuum-type, made of enamel material, with stirring; the medium is corrosive. What type of level gauge would be suitable? The differential pressure is selected; the density varies ; Radio frequency admittance is used; there is stirring and steam ; Radar options are expensive ; If a level switch is used, stirring will have a significant impact on the float-type level switch; moreover, it’s difficult to make openings in enamel reactors ; Use an external ultrasonic level switch; it’s a vacuum environment after all. Could everyone give some advice? Thank you.
Reply #22011-07-29
With stirring in place and the rotation speed not being very high, is it possible to use a float-type level switch for controlling high and low liquid levels? Is it stable?
Reply #32011-07-29
The mixing tank operates intermittently, not continuously, right? It is said that a flow meter can be installed at the inlet to enable calculation and quantitative production
Reply #42011-07-29
A level switch or a magnetic float level gauge can be used, but a static well needs to be installed to ensure stable operation.
Reply #52011-07-31
Choose a magnetic float level gauge with an external opening for regular cleaning of dirt
Reply #62011-07-31
A level electrode can be used. Given the presence of corrosion, it is likely that the environment is one with strong acids or strong bases; the medium should have a certain level of electrical conductivity. The presence of spare ports is convenient in such cases. If the corrosivity is not high, a 316L electrode can be used; in cases of extremely high corrosivity, graphite electrodes should be employed. Since stirring takes place, the distance between the two electrodes should be more than 10 centimeters
Reply #72011-08-01
For a cost-effective option, use a magnetic float level gauge; remember to drain it regularly
Reply #82011-08-01
Insufficient parameters provided. Avoid using radar if possible: it’s expensive and extremely unreliable!
Reply #92011-08-01
Reply to 9# Forum Wanderer: “Avoid using radar if possible: it’s expensive and extremely unreliable!” "Does it mean it’s not suitable for this case?
Reply #102011-08-01
If the position of the liquid level sensor in your mixing port is large enough, I would recommend using a 4-wire radar system along with a sleeve; if there’s an opening on the side, then many options are available. As you mentioned earlier, it’s not easy to create such an opening.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.