Moderator Self-Discipline Code (Draft) – Please share your opinions
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Niuniu on 2011-8-1 08:30. Rules for moderators’ self-discipline (draft) – please share your opinions. 1. Moderators shall not give other team members a rating of more than 1 Wealth point (except when paying salaries). 2. The moderator’s rating for other team management members shall not exceed 3 Wealth points. 3. The scoring of regular members by team members shall follow the existing forum regulations. 4. If a team member is reported or found to have given numerous illegal ratings using their fake accounts, action will be taken in accordance with the forum’s relevant rules. Once this code is signed, double penalties will be applied in case of violations.
It’s time to implement strict management of wealth. Comply, practice.
This post was last edited by Shutong on 2011-8-1 at 11:34. Niuniu has expressed what I’ve been wanting to say these past few days; I was preparing to post it. Additional suggestions: 1. Add regulations regarding rewards for uploaded materials. 2. I think the rule stating that \"management team members should rate regular members according to the forum’s existing guidelines\" should also be changed; it is suggested to set a maximum rating limit, such as 8 or 10 wealth points. If this is done, it can eliminate a lot of forum disputes caused by ratings. I took a close look at the 3D ratings; there were hardly any fights, and that’s because the ratings are relatively low and there are strict restrictions in place. I always have the feeling that Haichuan Wealth will gradually accumulate in people’s hands and be unable to be spent, and many forums have become the main reason for the silence among long-time members. Controlling the distribution of wealth and exploring new consumption channels are the only actions HaiChuan can take right away.
Well, I agree with the original poster’s opinion; it’s okay to lower the wealth score appropriately~~
Support – in particular, those who cause trouble must be dealt with firmly and severely
I support this suggestion; it is necessary to prevent wealth from concentrating heavily in the hands of a small elite management group, which would lead to an increasing gap between the rich and the poor
This can be carried out, but let’s wait and see what the boss decides. I just took a look at the salary posts – there are always some people who give points to those who reply or post messages. In my opinion, for discussion posts, whether they relate to the management office or various regional offices, it’s better if the moderators don’t give any points. Just a few short sentences can result in 10 or more points, or even more~
Reply to 6# fossil-zhang: Excellent!!! Support! ! Support! ! !
Reply to 10# kaixuanzz: I have always been in favor of members rating each other, but how many actually do it? If the moderators do not assign scores, it will surely affect the enthusiasm of the users; anyway, there isn’t much practice of members rating each other in the ammonia synthesis section!
Reply to 1# Niuniu: The mutual rating between moderators should be determined based on specific circumstances. Sometimes, the super moderator needs to give appropriate rewards to those moderators who come up with reasonable suggestions; it’s important that these rewards are given in a timely manner, rather than only at the end of the month or as part of the regular salary. Timely rewards can help boost moderators’ enthusiasm for carrying out their duties； Additionally, there is a set of regulations in our industry sector: every ten days, an assessment is conducted on the performance of the forum administrators, divided into the first and second halves of the period (the latter half is mainly used for salary payments). The person who ranks first in terms of performance receives 50 points as a reward, the second-place winner gets 40 points, and so on. I have assigned this task to assistant Xiao Chao. When evaluating moderators, it is important to consider whether their contributions are valuable. The biggest issue facing the forum at present is how to encourage consumption; if everyone focuses on finding solutions in this area, then other problems should be easy to resolve. I previously suggested to the boss the idea of creating a “Gates Award” to encourage people to donate their wealth, with those who donate ranking higher – this would be much better than the current system based on the number of posts posted on the forum. It could also help boost consumption. However, the boss said that implementing this might present certain difficulties. One more point: since the wealth displayed on the forum is virtual, is it really necessary for everyone to take it so seriously? Personal opinion, for reference only.
Reply to 6# fossil-zhang: There’s a wealth ranking on the forum; I wonder if you’ve seen it?:lol