How should credit be understood in this context?
Thread Content
When an operator action is part of an SIS, the availability and reliability of that operator action must be specified in the SRS and taken into account in the performance calculations for the SIS. The credit that can be assigned for such actions needs to be limited by human factor considerations such as the speed at which actions must be taken and the complexity of the tasks involved. When an operator’s actions are part of an SIS, their effectiveness and reliability must be clearly outlined in the SRS and included in the assessments of the SIS’s performance.
Can \"credit\" be understood as credit rating?
Reply to 2# xchzhi2010: It should refer to “scores”. When an operator’s action is part of an SIS, the availability and reliability of that operator action must be specified in the SRS and taken into account in the performance calculations for the SIS. The credit that can be assigned needs to be limited by human factor considerations such as how quickly actions need to be taken and the completeness of the tasks involved. When an operator’s actions are part of an SIS, their effectiveness and reliability must be clearly outlined in the SRS and included in the assessments of the SIS’s performance. The score obtained is limited by human factors such as the reaction time required to perform the actions and the complexity of the corresponding tasks.
When an operator action is part of an SIS, the availability and reliability of that operator action must be specified in the SRS and taken into account in the performance calculations for the SIS. The amount of credit that can be assigned to such actions needs to be limited by human factor considerations such as the speed at which actions must be taken and the complexity of the tasks involved. When an operator’s actions are part of an SIS, their effectiveness and reliability must be clearly defined in the SRS and included in the assessments of the SIS’s performance. Its reliability is limited by human factors such as the reaction time required to perform the operations and the complexity of the corresponding tasks.
I think “reliability (level)” is better.