Energy recovery
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Yan Qiusheng on 2010-12-3 at 14:22. What is the efficiency of turbines in recovering energy from propylene carbonate? I’m seeking advice from experienced sailors.
The energy efficiency of turbines in recovering propylene carbonate is very low, reaching at most 20%. Moreover, the operation of these turbines is unstable; their overrunning clutches often get damaged, and the costs associated with them are high. According to investigations, most enterprises across the country that owned turbo-turbines have shut them down and are no longer using them. Such as Shijiazhuang Fertilizer Factory, Shandong Ningyang Fertilizer Factory, Dezhou Hualu Hengsheng, etc. Turbine recovery is a first-generation technology. There is a new second-generation energy recovery technique – the turbine booster pump, which is suitable for wet carbon removal; its recovery efficiency can exceed 50%, and it operates stably. In foreign countries, it has been in use for over a decade. If you need detailed information, I can send it to you
The turbine is effective at recovering the energy from propylene carbonate; our factory’s 680-kilowatt pumps can save around 160 kilowatts of electricity, and they operate very smoothly. Many manufacturers are using this technology now – the investment is recovered within half a year, and there is no need for replacement over 1 to 3 years. What was said on the second floor is incorrect; I work in production, not in advertising. If you have any questions, feel free to discuss them. (27 kilograms of carbon removal)
Our factory is a specialized manufacturer that produces lean liquid pumps, semi-lean liquid pumps, and hydraulic level controllers.
Reply to 2# ysghk: Could you send one to me? The email address is liutaoandzdy@sina.com
I remember that at Runtian Chemical in Yucheng, Shandong, they were using carbon-propane decarburization at 1.7 MPa at that time, and the energy recovery system worked quite well.
Many chemical companies are using hydraulic turbine energy recovery systems, and the results are quite good; the recovery efficiency is generally above 75%. I have detailed information available – please send me an email if you need it.
The energy recovery operation of carbon propylene decarboxylation at Shandong Dong’e Fertilizer Factory is also performing well.
Hello, everyone! Our company offers comprehensive solutions for turbine energy recovery systems, featuring high efficiency and excellent economic benefits. The main equipment differs from screw and reciprocating compressors currently available on the market, which have disadvantages such as low efficiency and high maintenance requirements. Interested friends can send me a private message.