Thread Content
For example, there is only a visual diagram, along with the standard specifications G505/40/100. According to the standards for grid plates, 50 represents the width at which the flat bars are supported, 5 is the thickness of those flat bars, 40 is the spacing between the flat bars, and 100 is the spacing between the crossbars. And I know the shape is a trapezoidal diagram. Can it be processed this way? Can we give the processing plant a trapezoidal shape outline? Should a detailed machining drawing be created? For the detailed machining drawings, are only the data for G505/40/100 sufficient? Thank you all
Provide the platform’s exterior and structural diagrams to the steel grating manufacturer; he will produce the grating, assign it a number, and assemble it on site using that number as a guide. Sometimes it is necessary to add secondary beams. Pay special attention to leaving holes; if they are cut on site, it will look very unsightly. 505/40/100 means a flat steel bar of 50*5 dimensions, with a spacing of 40 between such bars and a spacing of 100 between the horizontal bars. This specification is not suitable for operator platforms, as the spacing of 40 is too large; it makes it easy for items such as nuts to fall, which can be dangerous. A 50*5 flat steel bar is excessive – it’s too heavy and represents a waste of resources. I’m not sure what purpose your platform serves that requires such large flat steel bars.
It’s 25*5, haha. I just want to ask how to draw a structural diagram I thought giving it a shape and standards would be enough
Its structure should be different from that of the step plate, right? The standards also do not specify the structure of the platform grid. I think the platform grid should have a different structure from the step plates; it shouldn’t have any screw holes, right?