Regarding manual re-evaluation during marking

Thread Content

Repost: Candidates eligible for manual reevaluation are those whose scores on the written tests of professional knowledge (Day 1) and professional cases (Day 2) have reached the specified threshold (60 points in all years except 2007, and 60 points this year as well). The re-evaluation threshold is determined based on the pass rate for the machine-readable cards; this year, the pass rate for scores of 60 or above on those cards reached the expected 15%, so 60 points was set as the re-evaluation threshold. The re-evaluation threshold is determined by the management committee itself, without input from the Ministry of Human Resources; ultimately, the Ministry of Human Resources sets the passing score based on the recommendations of the management committee. Process for manual re-evaluation: A three-review system is adopted. In accordance with the unified standards for re-evaluation of test papers, those identified as passing by the initial scorers (having met the required number of correct answers for re-evaluation) have valid card-reading scores, and their re-evaluation scores are equivalent to their card-reading scores ； Those papers deemed Unqualified by the first-round scorers (as the number of questions passed in the reevaluation did not meet the required threshold) must undergo a second-round reevaluation by other scorers ； If it still fails after being re-evaluated by the second-round scorers, then that test paper shall be deemed failed; its score obtained from card reading is invalid, and the re-evaluation score will be the higher of the scores from the first-round re-evaluation and the second-round re-evaluation ； If, after re-evaluation by the second-level scorers, the test paper is determined to be qualified, it must undergo a third (final) review by the expert advisory group ； For those who pass the third review (final review), their card-reading scores are valid; the review score is equivalent to the card-reading score ； Those who fail the third review (final review) shall be deemed to have submitted an unsatisfactory exam paper; their card-reading scores are invalid, and the review score shall be the higher of the scores from the first review and the third review. For test papers identified as failing the re-evaluation, staff should fill out a registration form for such papers, and it shall be filed for record after being signed by the scorers for the first and second rounds of evaluation, or by the scorer for the first round and the expert for the third (final) round of evaluation. Additional note: 1. Some people, after seeing their scores, said they failed on the first day and also on the second day; in reality, however, the test papers from the second day were not re-evaluated manually, so the displayed scores were likely higher than the actual scores. 2. Some people, after seeing the scores, said they passed on the first day but scored 58 on the second day, just short of passing. In reality, the test papers from the second day were re-evaluated manually, but once a score of 58 was assigned, no further evaluation was carried out.