Regarding the scope of mandatory use of lower pipe spigots
Thread Content
It is said that when loading materials with a fire hazard classification of Class A, it is recommended to use bottom-mounted dip pipes; does anyone know which regulation this comes from?
I’m not sure if what the original poster is referring to is liquefied hydrocarbons, liquid ammonia, or something similar~ Article 16 of the \"Guiding Opinions of the Office of the State Council’s Safety Committee on Further Strengthening Work Related to the Safe Production of Hazardous Chemicals\" addresses this
**Mandated. To protect the environment and reduce waste. Media such as gasoline and diesel require the use of lower loading nozzles. :) QQ: 894476060. Feel free to add me as a friend so we can have a detailed conversation.
Are there any mandatory requirements? I think lower garments are a requirement for environmental protection, aimed at oil and gas recovery, right? Could you provide a bit more information?:)
If Europe and the US do it, it would be embarrassing if we didn’t do it too! Personally, I see it as a side effect of oil and gas recovery and improved safety. :lol
Underwater loading is necessary; while it helps address environmental issues, it also presents efficiency problems. The speed of underwater loading seems to be slower, which indirectly increases the working time for manufacturers and distributors. For logistics drivers, this is truly a difficult situation.
Safety regulations – check those issued by the **Safety Supervision Bureau**.
Please refer to the mandatory requirements of GB20950-2007; for the environmental protection needs of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, it was stipulated that oil depots must implement systems for delivering oil underground and for recovering oil vapors.