Discussion on the wealth range obtained from signing in
Thread Content
Currently, the score for signing in ranges from 1 to 3. Should a risk mechanism be introduced, so that the score ranges from -5 to +10? This way, there would be a chance of losing points when signing in, as well as a high chance of gaining points. It’s not worth it, whatever people think
There needs to be a novice protection mechanism; otherwise, one will lose gold coins before even having the chance to place any bets.
The originally set amount of points for signing in was 1-3 points; this was intended to encourage members to sign in regularly. In order to earn those points, members would sign in every day to get 1-3 points, and if they had time, they could also read posts and participate in discussions. If a risk mechanism is introduced, and the rewards are low while there is a certain level of risk, many members will not show up even if they sign in every day. So one needs to think carefully before acting.
I agree with what was said on the third floor; this is random, and once it’s introduced, there’s too much uncertainty
I personally think there shouldn’t be negative points, otherwise signing in would be meaningless! People would rather have less than be deprived of it! So I’d rather not sign in! Actually, the current score isn’t very high. Could we consider awarding medals to those who have been active for a long time or who have logged in consistently? I’ve seen some forums do this: things like the “Time Pendant” – requiring 1000 hours of activity or something similar. Please consider this suggestion, administrator!
Regarding negative wealth, it might be better not to implement a system that deducts points for signing in, as visiting a forum is meant to be a pleasant experience. If points are deducted after signing in, it could make members feel discouraged, and it would also be demotivating for newcomers who have just started using the forum.
The purpose of using sign-ins to earn rewards is to encourage more people to visit Haichuan and participate in exchanges there. Introducing negative points would represent a risk for everyone; perhaps for this reason, people would be reluctant to take that risk and avoid signing in, which would go against the original intention behind having this sign-in feature.
I agree with what was said on the third floor; this is random, and once it’s introduced, there’s too much uncertainty
:) It’s best to avoid getting negative scores, otherwise they will lose interest in signing in; it’s better to go for options that guarantee a profit
Don’t get any negative points! To encourage sign-ins, it would be great if it were proportional to the number of consecutive days signed in!
:It could be discussed whether introducing a bonus based on the number of consecutive days of logging in could contribute to the amount of wealth obtained. Or, after adhering to a certain period of time, an additional reward in the form of a certain amount of wealth might also be introduced.