HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Which is more expensive, a cement frame or a steel structure?

2012-02-16View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by slayerstar on 2012-2-16 09:45. I have a question: for the same device framework structure, which is more costly, one built with reinforced concrete or one with steel? Which one is more useful? Please ask an experienced friend to help answer!
Reply #22012-02-16
Steel structure costs are high. . . . . . . .
Reply #32012-02-17
Which one is more durable in comparison? Concrete or steel frame?
Reply #42012-02-17
The fire resistance rating of steel structures is not high; in the recent tender for steel structures, the cost was 7,100 yuan per ton, including labor, materials, processing, as well as painting and rust removal.
Reply #52012-02-17
Steel structures have high costs, but each has its advantages: steel structure construction takes less time, though the cost is high and modifications are easy to make; Concrete construction takes a long time and is not easy to modify.
Reply #62012-02-17
It’s easy to install pipe racks on steel structures! Everyone who works with pipes loves them!
Reply #72012-02-17
Cement frames are low-cost and durable, requiring little special maintenance. If your project requires a fast pace, tight deadlines, and ample funding, then go with steel frames.
Reply #82012-02-17
Reinforced concrete structures have a long construction period, are difficult to modify once completed, and have lower costs; Steel structure construction takes less time, and it can be modified according to different requirements; the piping industry prefers this type of structure, although its cost is relatively higher.
Reply #92012-02-17
The cost of a cement frame is relatively lower; the construction time is longer, its corrosion resistance is better, and less maintenance is required in the long term. Steel structures are more expensive, require faster construction, have higher costs associated with corrosion protection and less effective protection against corrosion, and thus need regular maintenance. The person asking should consider their own specific circumstances before making a decision
Reply #102012-02-19
Cement frames have poorer seismic resistance compared to steel structures, and steel structures have a lower fire resistance rating than cement frames
Reply #112012-02-20
Cement frameworks take longer to construct, are slightly cheaper, have better corrosion resistance, and cannot be easily modified once completed. Steel structures are faster to build, but are more expensive; they require regular maintenance. Their fire resistance is poor, making them less safe. That’s about all I can think of

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.