The solid content of the crystal is 20% – how should a centrifuge be selected?
Thread Content
The solid content of crystals in the crystallized liquid is 20%, and the crystal diameter ranges from 0.15 to 0.5 mm. The partner hopes to separate the crystals on a continuous or semi-continuous basis, with the moisture content in the resulting solids being below 10%. I would appreciate advice from experts on which type of centrifuge would be suitable. Thank you :)
What is the processing capacity per hour? Is the solution corrosive? Any centrifuge with average specifications can meet your requirements; choose one with a smaller diameter for small quantities, and one with a larger diameter for larger quantities.
For this, you can directly contact the equipment provider and ask them to provide you with the specific equipment parameters.
Bipolar piston push centrifuge. . . .
Agree with the opinion on floor 4; it is recommended that the original poster learn about pusher centrifuges. In the separation of ferrous sulfate in the titanium dioxide industry, pusher centrifuges perform much better than other types of centrifuges. There are specialists in this area on the Hunhai Chuan forum. You can search for them and get in touch. Also, please note the physical parameters such as viscosity.
First, use a thickener to bring the solid content of the crystals to around 40%, and then use a piston-fed centrifuge. After separation, it contains about 4% water. Information on piston push centrifuges: http://348874896.qzone.qq.com/#!app=4
I recommend bipolar pusher centrifuges; our unit has used them in the membrane-based sodium sulfate removal project, and the results have been very good
May I ask, what is the sodium sulfate removal method? Is it to freeze and precipitate sodium and then separate it using a centrifuge?
Yes. First, concentration is achieved using membrane separation, followed by low-temperature freezing to induce crystallization of the concentrated solution, and then dehydration is carried out using a centrifuge.
Oh, I see. . . . . . . Thank you!