Operation of the first bituminous coal chemical project using GE gasification technology
Thread Content
This post was last edited by jensse on 2012-3-26 at 16:37. It was learned on March 16, 2012, that China’s first coal chemical project using GE gasification technology, the Guizhou Jinchiji Chemical Coals project, officially commenced operations in Tongzi, Guizhou. It is reported that the project utilizes 3 sets of GE gasification units, and by using bituminous coal from Guizhou that has a high ash content, high ash fusion point, and poor reactivity as raw material, it is capable of producing 4.6 million standard cubic meters of syngas per day. Additionally, it can produce 300,000 tons of methanol and 300,000 tons of synthetic ammonia per year. In addition, GE signed a gasification license agreement with China Coal Shaanxi Yulin Energy & Chemical Co., Ltd. last July. The project will use 14 900-cubic-inch gasification units, with a coal conversion capacity of approximately 25 million cubic meters of syngas per day, resulting in around 3.6 million tons of methanol produced annually. The commercial goal of this project is to use gasification technology by 2015 to convert carbon-based fuels into electricity and other valuable products, such as olefins, fuels, natural gas, and fertilizers.
This unit has been in operation for nearly 101 days, with 3 days of shutdown in between. Could the owner provide some basic data on the operation of the Guizhou coal plant?
The title could be revised to make it more appropriate; it should read that the first GE water-coal slurry gasification technology was used commercially for bituminous coal
Learn* it. Haven’t come into contact with it. Our factory only uses multi-material slurry gasification technology.
Do you know what caused the stop?
I’ve worked with anthracite; I started doing that before you did. ##Wansheng Multicomponent Slurry is made from anthracite, with a volatility content of around 8% and a slurry-forming capacity of about 67%. It’s a pity that it has been shut down now because coal is too expensive. . . . . . . . . :'(