Thread Content
There are currently many types of internals for absorption towers, such as packed towers, floating valve towers, sieve plate towers, and so on. Let’s discuss which type of internal components for absorption towers performs best at present and exchange ideas with each other.
It is understood that many manufacturers now use structured packing in their distillation columns
As long as the number of trays is sufficient, floating valve towers also perform very well.
Now, new types of trays are being used, with improvements to sieve plate towers, such as those developed by Hebei University of Technology
Personally, I believe floating valve towers offer the best performance, with strong adaptability to load fluctuations.
We also want to make changes at Hebei University of Technology. Could you briefly introduce the technology and its effects?
Is the improved tray of Hebei University of Technology the vertical tray mentioned originally? A few years ago, there was a lot of information available on this technology. Those who are aware of the situation, could you please provide a detailed explanation?
What suits well is the best; it is essential to consider one’s own manufacturing capabilities and make an optimized choice of suitable internal components.
We use the improved tray from Hebei University of Technology, which is a type of three-dimensional spray tray. The effect is good
The new type of vertical sieve plate was developed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan between 1963 and 1968. In our country, it is referred to as a three-dimensional mass transfer tray; Tsinghua University and Hebei University of Technology have achieved research results in this area. The upper limit of the load has been increased, as has the lower limit.
I would like to ask expert poiuytr: How does this three-dimensional mass transfer tray compare to floating valve trays? Are there corresponding comparison data for these two types of internals?