Everyone, please help me figure out which of these offers to choose!
Thread Content
Here’s the situation: currently, in foreign companies, the compensation is average, and it’s somewhat a change of field. I interviewed with several companies outside and was accepted by all of them; the salary offer is 30% higher than my current one. One is to work on chemical projects as a PMC, with insurance. The other option is to work for a nuclear power company as an employer; the salary is 10K after taxes, with no other benefits. Both are state-owned enterprises, but they sign contracts with labor agencies ； There’s also a private enterprise owner who works on EPC projects in the coal chemical industry, focusing on experimental projects. Another one is recruited directly by a state-owned enterprise, but they work on projects that are not part of that company’s main business. There are no people in my surroundings who are in the same field, so I really don’t know how to decide; I’m completely confused
How long has the original poster been here? What was the main thing that was done originally? I work in human resources; let’s exchange ideas
9+ years of work experience, 7+ years of on-site experience; mainly involved in project construction, petrochemical pipelines, equipment, and structures; has some knowledge of civil engineering
My friend, it’s best to choose what suits you; it’s not necessary to go for the highest salary – as long as you’re happy.
It seems that having work experience is indeed a advantage – with so many options available, it appears that the most painful thing in life isn’t having no choices, but having too many of them.
I just started working recently. I see that you’re mainly looking for people in design-related fields; I specialize in construction management
Oh, like that? That’s great! ~! ....................
Do you have any good suggestions? . . . . . . Why is there still a word limit?
Is all these years of experience worth 10k? I wonder which city the original poster is in
Which city is the poster from? Given your length of service, in first-tier cities, this salary is not particularly competitive. Objectively speaking, all of the options presented by the original poster have significant drawbacks, which explains why it’s difficult for them to make a decision: 1. The original poster is likely to give more importance to the first two state-owned enterprises, but signing a contract with a labor agency is a major drawback; people work in state-owned enterprises in search of stability. Moreover, it’s hard for informal employees in such enterprises to feel a sense of belonging ； 2. The biggest risk for private coal chemical enterprises is that their projects are experimental in nature ； 3. Direct recruitment into state-owned enterprises is good, but it’s not the main business; it’s much easier to advance in the core departments of such companies. After saying all this, I just want to give the original poster an objective suggestion; there is no intention of criticizing them. Please choose based on your own circumstances. If it were me, I might keep holding on and look around further. Or talk to these companies again to try to overcome their major weaknesses. Also, different companies will use different titles, so it’s still necessary to evaluate those titles.