HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Which foreign technology was used as a reference for the process technology of the space furnace? (Is it Texaco, Shell, Siemens...? )

2015-12-04View Original

Thread Content

Which foreign technology was adopted in terms of process engineering for China’s largest space furnace? (Is it Texaco, Shell, Siemens...? )
Reply #22015-12-04
GSP’s combustion chamber + Texaco’s quench chamber = space furnace
Reply #32015-12-09
Former Shell system shell (identical)
Reply #42015-12-16
Shell technology + Texaco hybrid
Reply #52015-12-24
The furnace chamber and water wall are modeled after Shell, while the burners and feeding methods are based on Texaco; in other words, it’s a combination of elements from various companies
Reply #62015-12-24
Many of the pipelines inside need surfacing; otherwise, they are prone to corrosion by hydrogen sulfide
Reply #72015-12-25
The coal conveying system belongs to Shell; the combustion chamber in the upper part of the gasifier is from GSP, while the lower part as well as the slag treatment system in the rear section are from Texaco
Reply #82018-12-28
It’s borrowing there; it’s complete plagiarism and grafting. Combine furnaces of the same grade from different sources completely together. Just change the tag number. There is no own process package; only EPC is implemented, and in reality no own computing capacity exists (it seems to be just about selling combined drawings:@). If you’re capable, go ahead and develop your own 3,000-ton furnace. Nowadays, for 3,000-ton furnaces operating at 4.0 MPa, the powder feeding systems of shell type can be copied, but it’s no longer possible to copy the burners of GSP type (since GSP has been phased out by Shenning). GE offers quench chambers capable of handling 6.5 MPa, but those for 4.0 MPa seem not to exist yet (including systems for slag treatment); it’s therefore difficult to copy such technologies. Therefore, although a project of 3,000 tons has been approved, it is difficult to implement. 6.5MPa gasification is a major drawback of pulverized coal, so there’s no need to discuss it.
Reply #92019-02-28
GSP nozzle, Shell coal feeding, water wall, from the lower part of the gasifier to the water system GE
Reply #102019-07-03
You have all 3 of those listed, isn’t that amazing;P

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.