HCBBS Forum (English)
This is an automated machine translation of the original Chinese thread. .Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original Post" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster’s personal views and intended for individual study and research. User and moderator comments, recommendations and ratings do not imply platform endorsement or confirmation of intellectual property rights. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com. Users outside Chinese Mainland shall register via email.

I would like to ask all fellow industry professionals: the investment requirements for methanol synthesis technologies from Lurgi in Germany, David in the UK, and Mitsubishi in Japan

Thread Content

This post was last edited by niujiajun on 2016-2-15 22:08. I would like to ask fellow experts: for the methanol synthesis processes of Lurgi in Germany with a capacity of 1.8 million tons and Davy in the UK with the same capacity, what is the total cost, including technical patent fees, process package costs, and equipment costs? How much does it cost for each of them approximately? Both of these have a significant number of users in China, but do any of you know about them? Additionally, the Mitsubishi Gas SPC super synthesis tower in Japan has a capacity of 850,000 tons per unit (it seems that the maximum annual production capacity is 850,000 tons; if this is incorrect, please let me know). It doesn’t seem that there are any actual users of this technology in China, and it’s likely that no one knows how much it costs Thank you. Finally, I wish the Haichuan Forum and all its members prosperity and further growth in the Year of the Monkey!
Reply #22016-02-25
In China, 180 models generally use a radial series-parallel configuration; the Dolunning coal plants used a Ruchi water-cooled series-air-cooled design in the past, with a synthesis pressure of 8.5 megapascals. I’m not in the engineering field, so I’m not very familiar with these costs. In my opinion, using two Casari towers connected in parallel at 5-6 megapascals might be the best option, even though there have been reports of leaks in the Casari towers. Overall, in terms of conversion rate as well as the heat and cooling energy consumption per unit of alcohol produced, it should be superior to other options.
Reply #32016-02-25
Great post; I hope those who are interested will participate actively

About This Page

This is a machine-translated English version of content from HCBBS Forum. The translation is generated automatically for SEO and international accessibility.