[

2020-03-16View Original

Thread Content

"一氧化碳制备方法及及及优劣比较比",

Reply #22020-03-17

"背景：我社新项目需88Nm3/hCO，新上CO一套CO装置，询各位专家该如何选择。方法：比如焦炭制CO、天然气制CO、氢气制COCO CO、甲醇制COCOCO； �比较 "工艺比较、投资比较、成本比较、技术成熟度比较比较、占地比较等等 "希通过比较得出一个最优方案"

Reply #32020-03-17

"用量太少只能用石油焦纯氧制CO方案"

Reply #42020-03-17

"要与你社现有装置的匹配、外部原料来源、储运装卸设施等诸多情况才能判定 "从成本考虑 "天然气制CO >氢气制CO >甲醇制CO >焦炭制CO"

Reply #52020-03-19

"就这点量、附近找找有没有合成气来企业直接买是最合适的"

Reply #62020-03-19

"能问一下新项目是什么产品么"

Reply #72020-03-22

"我厂用自己设计制造的CO发生发器每台制气88Nm3/hCO、55台为一组共4408Nm3/hCO、原料是石油焦和纯氧"

Reply #82020-03-23

"用量少看看能不能用以前的煤气发生发生炉、只不过还需要后期的净化和提纯处理"

Reply #92020-03-23

"真量太小了不论用形式的煤气 "发生炉、炉可能可能不用投多少钱、但后续的净化处理的投资不比大装置少多少 "因为工艺流程在那里摆着、不可能走捷径 "您是制药 "炉对对净化还有特别特别的要求 "真特别鸡肋"

Reply #102020-03-24

"确有这个问题后期的净化处理和分离流程都少不了"

Reply #112020-03-27

"就是、为此事特别伤脑筋"

Reply #122020-03-30

"循流流化床气化炉一台5558Nm3/hCO、一氧化碳含量约80左右 "配套得有脱硫装置投资80万以内"

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

[

Thread Content

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links