HCBBS Forum (Español)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

["¿

2019-11-02View Original

Thread Content

user
Reply #22019-11-02
继续翻译剩余的文本。
Reply #32019-11-02
看输送距离,长距离电伴热,短距离蒸汽伴热
Reply #42019-11-03
没有绝对的好与不好,这需要视具体情况而定。 管线的口径、距离、输送的介质物性、伴热强度、运行维护的成本、新建厂还是老厂改造、企业的公用工程条件等,都需要考虑,岂是一个好或不好能够简单判断的。
Reply #52019-11-10
肯定蒸汽伴热,维护简单
Reply #62019-11-25
建议蒸汽伴热,电伴热极端天气不行!
Reply #72019-11-25
北方洗眼器什么的怎么伴热的
Reply #82019-11-25
常流水。。伴热啥的不管用:L
Reply #92019-12-04
电伴热使用在做好规范安装,保温设计,温度选择的情况下,个人认为比蒸汽伴热效果好,温度控制也很精准,还避免了蒸汽伴热疏水冻结的麻烦
Reply #102019-12-04
没有绝对的好与不好,这需要视具体情况而定。
Reply #112019-12-09
??电伴热都取消了吗? 请问是什么原因呢?
Reply #122019-12-09
看你那有富裕蒸汽不?有的话就可以用来伴热,这样节约能源
Reply #132019-12-09
我觉的蒸汽伴热好,耗能方面、维护保养方面还是蒸汽吧
Reply #142019-12-10
还是需要具体情况具体分析,电伴热和蒸汽伴热各有优势。
Reply #152019-12-22
个人觉得还是蒸汽伴热的优势更大,电伴热维修以及后期保养太费事。
Reply #162020-06-01
有的地方着过火,保养也费劲,全厂全取了

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.